Tag: criminal justice

  • A Tragic Mistake in Oregon Highlights the Real Risks of Domestic Violence Calls

    A Tragic Mistake in Oregon Highlights the Real Risks of Domestic Violence Calls

    A domestic violence call in Albany, Oregon ended in tragedy when police responding to a reported kidnapping mistakenly shot the victim rather than the aggressor. The incident highlights the extreme dangers of armed domestic calls, the need for accountability without political theater, and the hard realities officers face when violent suspects exploit chaos and split-second…

  • California Did This First: What Colorado’s New Custody Ruling Reveals About a Longstanding Legal Trend

    California Did This First: What Colorado’s New Custody Ruling Reveals About a Longstanding Legal Trend

    The Colorado Court of Appeals recently allowed prosecutors to charge a felony per child for violating custody orders, aligning with California’s long-established legal framework. While this approach emphasizes individual harm to each child, it raises concerns over excessive prosecutorial power during family crises, prompting questions about state intervention in vulnerable situations.

  • Colorado Appeals Court: One Custody Order, Multiple Felonies—Per Child

    Colorado Appeals Court: One Custody Order, Multiple Felonies—Per Child

    A Colorado Court of Appeals ruling allows prosecutors to charge separate felonies for each child affected by a custody violation, even under one order. This decision increases legal repercussions for parents, offering prosecutors greater leverage in plea negotiations. Concerns arise regarding potential overreach and the impact on families during custody disputes.

  • When Allegations Outlive the Case

    When Allegations Outlive the Case

    The article explores the complexities of unresolved criminal allegations within California’s court system, particularly in the context of the ongoing case against Giselle Smiel, who faces felony charges. It highlights the challenges of dismissals and protective orders that, while indicating institutional concern, lack definitive adjudicated findings, raising questions about fairness and transparency in legal processes.

  • The Public Has a Right to Know Whether Government Agencies Followed the Law Before Taking Someone’s Freedom.

    The Public Has a Right to Know Whether Government Agencies Followed the Law Before Taking Someone’s Freedom.

    Los Angeles and San Diego officials are under scrutiny for withholding public records related to the prosecution of Giselle Smiel, raising concerns over transparency and due process. Taxpayer-funded agencies are stalling information requests, undermining public trust in the justice system by obscuring the facts surrounding an arrest that severely impacts a citizen’s freedom.