Investigating California Justice, Courts, and Government Accountability.
-
Reality TV Star Spencer Pratt Enters Los Angeles Mayor’s Race as Populist Outsider
Reality TV star Spencer Pratt has entered the 2026 Los Angeles mayoral race, positioning himself as a populist outsider fueled by wildfire anger, government failures, and frustration with City Hall’s response to disaster recovery.
-
Who Is Running for Governor of California in 2026?
California’s 2026 gubernatorial election, taking place on November 3, features a crowded candidate field, primarily from the Democratic party, amidst a nonpartisan top-two primary on June 2. Voter feelings are unsettled, with many undecided. Key issues include crime, housing affordability, and economic recovery, creating unpredictability in the race.
-
California’s Fraud Problem Is Real — But Politics Is Obscuring the Truth
California has a real fraud problem, but partisan posturing from Washington and Sacramento is obscuring the facts. With billions in federal funds frozen and few public details released, taxpayers deserve transparency—not political theater.
-
California’s 2025 Wildfires Exposed a Crisis of Governance, Not Just Climate
The January 2025 wildfire disaster in Southern California revealed systemic failures in preparedness and response, leading to significant loss of life and property. Recovery remains stalled, particularly for marginalized communities facing bureaucratic hurdles. Criticism of Governor Newsom’s leadership has intensified as California struggles with rebuilding and insurance challenges, highlighting urgent needs for policy reform.
-
When Bureaucracy Meets Baseball: Is the Government Overreaching on the Athletics’ Trademark?
The Oakland Athletics, a century-old MLB team, face trademark challenges in naming their franchise in Las Vegas due to federal regulations. The USPTO deems “Las Vegas Athletics” too generic, creating a procedural catch-22. This situation highlights the conflict between bureaucratic rigidity and the realities of brand recognition for established franchises.
-
Law and Order vs. One-Party Rule: Chad Bianco’s Hardline Pitch to California Voters
Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco is running for California governor on a blunt law-and-order platform, framing the 2026 race as a referendum on Democratic rule in Sacramento and pledging to restore public safety, cut government waste, and rein in what he calls failed progressive policies.
-
Swalwell’s Anti-ICE Rhetoric Tests the Line Between Oversight and Political Recklessness
Eric Swalwell’s gubernatorial campaign in California emphasizes stringent accountability measures for ICE agents, including unmasking during operations. Critics argue his rhetoric risks delegitimizing federal authority and inciting violence against officers. As Californians face pressing issues, they must consider whether this confrontational stance enhances safety or merely escalates political conflict.
-
California DMV Fixes Old Real ID Glitch — Here’s What It Really Means
California’s DMV revealed that approximately 325,000 Real ID holders must update their cards due to an outdated software error from 2006. This issue affects non-U.S. citizens’ ID expiration dates, not their eligibility. The DMV will expedite replacements at no charge, emphasizing that the state remains compliant with federal Real ID requirements.
-
San Francisco’s Reparations Fund: An Empty Account, a Loaded Debate, and a City Near a $1 Billion Deficit
San Francisco’s Mayor Daniel Lurie approved an ordinance establishing a Reparations Fund amid a budget deficit. This fund, intended for private donations, does not authorize reparations payments. The discussion is influenced by the controversial $5 million proposal from the 2023 reparations report, raising legal and fiscal concerns. Symbolically, it keeps the reparations idea alive.
-
Washington Democrats Move to Shield Child Care Providers From Public Scrutiny
A proposed bill in Washington, Senate Bill 5926, aims to expand privacy exemptions under the Public Records Act for all licensed child care providers. Critics argue it could reduce transparency and accountability, especially during heightened scrutiny of child care subsidies. The debate highlights tensions between privacy protection and taxpayer oversight.
Got news tips?
California Bay News 